Joined: May 2002
|Quote (stevestory @ July 24 2008,19:09)|
|Do you have any thoughts about why you hit a wall with it?|
From page 16 to 21 the "case for" fossils succession is supposedly presented. On page 22 they begin their case against. The "case for" was biased in its presentation, and their reply is simply 14 pages of lies. The rest of the book, based on spot checks, maintains this ratio of 4 biased "proscience" pages to 14 pages of creationist lies supposedly presenting "... the most qualified proponents and critics that we could."
If Paul Nelson could have signed on to these lies (and he did), then there is no point what-so-ever to expect him to honest about anything.
It is depressing.
"Science is the horse that pulls the cart of philosophy."
L. Susskind, 2004 "SMOLIN VS. SUSSKIND: THE ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE"