Joined: July 2006
|Quote (Joe G @ July 24 2007,18:34)|
|Quote (Arden Chatfield @ July 24 2007,16:10)|
|Quote (Joe G @ July 24 2007,13:39)|
|Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ July 24 2007,13:06)|
|So what's your ultimate point Joe? That god did it?|
Joe claimed to be a Muslim once, so perhaps his position is Allahdidit.
I was a christian once also.
Intelligent Design makes it possible to be an intellectually fullfilled atheist. It has absolutely no attachments to the divine what-so-ever.
If all religions were falsified tomorrow ID wouldn't be fazed. If the Bible were to be proven a hoax, ID wouldn't flinch.
What, then, is the essential defining difference that separates "god" from "the intelligent designer" exactly?
If the two terms are not interchangeable, then why not? I see no reason, and you've provided none so far.
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand