Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (VMartin @ Aug. 01 2007,16:14)|
One of these approaches leads to progress and an increase in our knowledge. The other approach (yours) leads to stupefaction.
I see. Criticising the theory of "survival advantage" of coloration leads to stupefaction. Abidance in neodarwinism even if it obviously contadicts facts leads to progress.
What do you have to offer that will lead to 'progress', V?
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus