Joined: June 2006
Your response came up as I worked on mine. Thank you for making the concession you didn't understand what you read. It's a step.
Where we are now is dealing with a question Steve posed on your old thread:
|The general question is, 'how do you get someone who doesn't know the first thing about science, to understand that a particular pseudoscience they like isn't science?'. FtK proves on a daily basis that we haven't found the answer to that question. |
Since you don't understand how science works, you are unfortunately incapable of making a competent comparison between ID and science. Do you realize this? Again, I appreciate the fact that you concede gaps in your knowledge. Do you concede this point as well?