Joined: Mar. 2007
|Why start at "peer reviewed papers"? Why not go and get a basic science education? One you clearly lack.|
Why indeed. What in the hell do you think I'm doing with the textbook Dave gave me? Are you all tone deaf (or I guess blind, in this case).
Who the hell cares about a one liner where I stated that I had read some peer reviewed papers? What was I supposed to do when they were posted to support the topic being discuss? Ignore the link and move on? Cripes, you people are unbelieveable. I can't honestly say that I didn't understand a word of what I read. That would be lying.
Of course I'd be better off starting with the basics, but shoot, I've been reading the basics in these forums for almost 3 years now. I'm find that I already understand much of the stuff I'm reading in Dave's textbook because I've been involved in this debate for so long.
I also am beginning to understand why college students accept this stuff as fact. It's all written without any consideration that a lot of it is speculation. And, it only covers topics ever so slightly. I find myself asking why, why, why and how do they come to that conclusion? I wouldn't have asked those questions as a college student because I was more interested in getting through the hour of class, getting a decent grade, and getting back to the bar & my social life ASAP.
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero