Joined: Oct. 2005
|Quote (Ftk @ June 10 2007,08:28)|
|No, I'm not going to "make a list". I gave you a whole freaking thread from kcfs to pan through in which many people posted various peer-reviewed papers to support their position. I read most of what was posted.|
Sheesh...why is it sooo hard to believe that I've read peer-reviewed papers, and who really cares?
I remember saying somewhere else here in this forum that I certainly didn't understand every single thing I've read by any means, but I got the general idea of what the poster was trying to get across to support his point.
You wade through all the crap at kcfs, I'm certainly not going to spend my time doing that.
I do not believe that you have read (with comprehension) peer-reviewed scientific papers.
The language is too obscure for a lay-person to have a clue what they are reading.
Your writing style gives away the position that you are not trained in any biology related science (just like me).
The reason people "care" is that you made a claim to have read "peer reviewed papers" in a way that implied that you could understand them and be capable of criticising them.