Joined: Jan. 2006
Okay, since I blew the joke Blipey set up for me, here's my chance to set things right.
You may recall that 'last spring', our favorite wife and concerned mother from Topeka wrote this:
Posted: April 02 2007,14:59
(Thatís an interesting observation, Stephen. †But, Iíve sat in on many lectures, classes, and debates regarding these topics, and Iíve also read many peer-reviewed papers, and I can tell you that I have never seen words in them like the following:
pathetic, moron, ass-whopping, crotch, homos, stupid, IDiot, cunt, etc., etc., etc.
Nor have I ever seen the sarcasm, ridicule and habitual poking fun of others who hold difference scientific perspectives or religious ideals at any of the aforementioned places where scientific issues are usually addressed. †
In actuality, there is little science discussed here at all. †The object of most of these threads seems to be merely to ridicule others...
Now, I've asked FTK more times than I can remember now just what ferkakte peer-reviewed papers she's read and I've been ignored every time. Not even an "oh shut up Arden", or an "I don't have to tell you anything!" or even an "I already told you!" Deafening silence.
So, I figured if this question gets its own thread, with no other distracting questions, it SHOULD be easier to get an answer.
So, FTK? Please to give us list now?
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus