Ftk
Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007
|
Richard,
It’s interesting that you are still use the “astrology” canard.
I’ve addressed this many times in the past because Behe corrected this assumption at a lecture I attended:
“Behe stated that at that point in the trial they were discussing the definition of science. He was asked if astrology was science and Behe alluded to astrology being considered science in the 13th and 14th century and that it in part led to astronomy. He was referring to historical times, not current times. But, the media only picked up his reference to astrology being acceptable in his definition of science.”
And, here.
-------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|