Joined: Oct. 2005
I love how people on this board track things down.
So Hunter says:
|Actually, I did not question the evolutionary explanation, but I guess that would spoil your story. Folks, I am really not your enemy here. I have no problem with evolution, in principle.|
Yet he wrote an essay titled
|“Why Evolution Fails the Test of Science”|
by the way, from Jason Rosenhouse's comments, Hunter is a PhD version of AFDave.
EDIT: I retract this complaint. It turns out that Why Evolution Fails the Test of Science accords with his 'in principle' statement. In that essay he claims, as he does here, not that there is some internal flaw in the theory, but that the evidence is too weak.