stevestory
Posts: 8329
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote | Philip Johnson:
I also don’t think that there is really a theory of intelligent design at the present time to propose as a comparable alternative to the Darwinian theory, which is, whatever errors it might contain, a fully worked out scheme. There is no intelligent design theory that’s comparable. Working out a positive theory is the job of the scientific people that we have affiliated with the movement. Some of them are quite convinced that it’s doable, but that’s for them to prove…No product is ready for competition in the educational world. |
Good Article in Berkeley Science Review.
hat tip to Ron Okimoto
LOL Johnson again:
| Quote | | There were specific things in the record...that convinced me that it was a loser and that made it quite easy for him to give judgment for the plaintiffs. I’m not at all complaining that he did that. When you have members of the school board saying things like we ought to stand up for Jesus because he died for us, that’s really asking for it. |
|
