Joined: April 2006
I don't expect them to lend to or detract from credibility. I want new people who have never met me to have some idea of where I'm coming from.
|These facts do not lend any credibility to your arguements.|
Faid-- The more I study this issue, the more I agree with Meyer that the Abductive approach with a Logical Inference to the Best Explanation is in fact used extensively by both scientists and historians to "establish" many theories (not prove, I understand) which are of great use to humanity. This is not to say that my conclusions are then automatically true. I expect to be required to do a great deal more work ... and I may fail. I admit that. If you used the same approach and your explanation was better, then it would be reasonable to adopt yours, to be sure.
A DILEMMA FOR THE COMMITTED NATURALIST
A Hi-tech alien spaceship lands on earth ... DESIGNED.
A Hi-tech alien rotary motor found in a cell ... NOT DESIGNED.