Joined: Oct. 2005
|Quote (thordaddy @ April 04 2006,21:44)|
|The same argument exists in this situation. If we know nothing of the designer (what constitutes human life) then how can we possibly draw ANY inferences from his explanations since his explanations are the basis for all our knowledge?|
I say it's bunk. We can define human life and science can certainly weigh in heavily.
Are you going for the prize in the "most outrageous strawman argument" category, Thordaddy? Who here, other than you, is arguing that we know nothing of what constitutes human life? You think if you can disprove that notion, you can prove…what, exactly, I'm not sure, since your argument from there rapidly decays into unintelligibility.
|But more to the point, you have once again claimed that science presents no evidence for defining the start of human life. Yet, you will claim to be human life. How did you come to this conclusion when you know nothing of your conception? You just assume your humaneness based on what, exactly?|
I've said no such thing. I've told you about a million times that life is a continuum, and to pick any particular point and state that that's the "beginning" is essentially arbitrary. You don't like that conclusion, so you ignore it. As Flint pointed out above, you've been told the exact same thing about 50 times by half the people posting to this thread, but you persist in ignoring it.
What needs to be cleared up is this;
If YOUR human life did not start at YOUR conception then when did it start?
Are you going to keep asking the same question over and over again in the hopes that at some point I'm going to give you a different answer? Because I'm not.
|If science cannot tell you then how can it tell you anything else?|
And again, the same stupidity. If science can't answer one particular question, it can't answer any questions? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you say things like that?
And if you want to talk about pathetic "defenses" for abortion, how about pathetic arguments against it? You're the one who seems to believe that a zygote has consciousness and a newborn infant lacks it. If that's not pathetic, I don't know what is. But it's further evidence that the anti-abortion crowd believes that life begins at conception and ends at birth.
2006 MVD award for most dogged defense of scientific sanity
"Atheism is a religion the same way NOT collecting stamps is a hobby." —Scott Adams