Joined: Jan. 2006
|Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Jan. 19 2006,226)|
He sunded quite resentful at the notion of having to actually provide some evidence to support his claims.
This is not a recent manifestation. I invoked genetic algorithms as an empirical disproof of Dembski's claims following Dembski's talk at the 1997 "Naturalism, Theism, and the Scientific Enterprise" conference. His response: "The logic is sound and the premises are valid, so the conclusion follows." No empirical test was necessary to Dembski then, and it does not seem that he has changed his mind in the interim.
Wesley, to clarify, do you mean Dembski's reply was
[My (as in Dembski)] logic is sound and [my] premises are valid, so [my] conclusion follows
Meaning he basically said "I am right because I say I am right"?
Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson