RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
phonon



Posts: 396
Joined: Nov. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 11 2007,20:27   

GD.

William Dembski, you are an overpaid IDIOT.

Quote
So let me spell it out: DIRECTED EVOLUTION IS NON-DARWINIAN. DARWINIAN EVOLUTION IS NON-DIRECTED.


Ok, then ask the "pro-ID" authors of the "pro-ID" paper why they call directed evolution of proteins "Darwinian".

http://www.springerlink.com/content/d514772515583767/fulltext.html
Quote
It is often said that random genetic methods to improve enzyme properties “rely on simple but powerful Darwinian principles of mutation and selection” (Johannes and Zhao 2006). We agree.


Oh and this is the best line:
Quote
“Directed evolution” properly falls under ID.
Like, say EUGENICS?

Fross was first to point this out, but Dembski needs it spelled out for him in caps.

--------------
With most men, unbelief in one thing springs from blind belief in another. - Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

To do just the opposite is also a form of imitation. - Georg Christoph Lichtenberg

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]