RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Zachriel



Posts: 2599
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 04 2007,07:04   

dopderbeck            
Quote
But PT purports to be something “objective” and “scientific,” which it clearly is not.

The Panda's Thumb is a virtual pub.
     
Quote
The Panda's Thumb is the virtual pub of the University of Ediacara. The patrons gather to discuss evolutionary theory, critique the claims of the anti evolution movement, defend the integrity of both science and science education, and share good conversation.



After a few drinks, Steve Steve can be very objective. (Note the thumb.)

It's ironic that the premier blog on Intelligent Design sets its standards by comparison to a pub. If they really have a case to make, they should make it before their peers in recognized scientific journals.

Add mathematicians to the list of scholars involved in the conspiracy to suppress the truth of Intelligent Design, along with geologists, physicists, cosmologists, biologists, geneticists, paleontologists, astronomers, biochemists, microbiologists, phylogenists, systematists, ecologists, climatologists, dendronologists, oceanographers, computational biologists, anatomists, biophysicists, molecular biologists, morphologists, botanists, paleobotanists, physiologists, the National Academy of Sciences, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the National Center for Science Education, every major scientific journal, and [gasp] even Stephen Hawking; are wrong (or lying), about the data which constitutes cores of their lifelong specialties.

--------------
Tard Acquisition and Repository Department

   
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]