RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 10879
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: April 01 2007,22:32   

Remember the guy with the spectacularly dumbass SLoT disproof of evolution, Granville Sewell? He's back:

31 March 2007
Is ID science?–a 30-year old opinion
Granville Sewell

In 1978-79 I was visiting professor in the computer science department at Purdue University, when the student newspaper (the Exponent) published a letter to the editor comparing “creationists” to “flat-earthers”. My reply, given below, was published a few days later. The reason I thought this 30-year-old letter might be of some interest to UD readers is how nicely it anticipates the current debate on whether ID is science or not (especially the last paragraph):

As Pat Hayes said:

The March of Progress
Granville Sewell: Defending creationism then, supporting ID today. Because it's all about the scientific evidence.

  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]