Joined: June 2006
|There’s not much detail in this article, but let me venture a guess: when the details come out, we’ll find that intelligent design (which includes evolutionary optimization) outshines unintelligent evolution at every turn.|
A few months ago, Febble was getting all kinds of flak at UD for suggesting that natural evolutionary mechanisms constitute the intelligence behind the design of biocomplexity. Now Dembski is saying that intelligent design includes evolutionary optimization, which is exactly what RM+NS is. Looks like Febble was right.
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot