Joined: Sep. 2006
|Quote (stevestory @ Mar. 22 2007,12:52)|
|I don't know if the IDers' ability to keep me entertained will last the year. |
ID is scientifically vacuous and intellectually sterile. Any such discussion is bound to be repetitious. When the ID argument is analyzed, most such fallacies revolve around the fundamental principles of scientific methodology and semantics. Actual evidence is rarely the issue.
As the political influence of Intelligent Design wanes, then the pedagogical purpose (and presumably entertainment value) of responding wanes as well.
Thrice Quadrice banned by Uncommon Descent.
Unilateral critic of Affirmations about Uniform Distribution in the Search Space of Proteins