RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 2715
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 07 2006,07:14   

DaveScot †  
For the life of me I canít think of a reason why theistic evolutionists would be opposed in principle to ID. ID only disputes the chance nature of evolution.

That is incorrect. ID claims to have *scientific evidence* of "intelligent design" as an explanation of biological diversity.

DaveScot †  
Now perhaps you can explain to me how any of this somehow opposes any of your personal religious convictions.

Because the claim is false. There is no such scientific evidence. Intelligent Design is a social and political movement that uses the language of science to sway the public. It has no scientific validity.

NATIONAL ACADEMY of SCIENCES: "The theory of evolution has become the central unifying concept of biology and is a critical component of many related scientific disciplines. In contrast, the claims of creation science lack empirical support and cannot be meaningfully tested."

Proudly banned three four five times by Uncommon Descent.
There is only one Tard. The Tard is One.

  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]