Joined: Dec. 2002
|Quote (Richardthughes @ Nov. 30 2006,13:55)|
|Quote (Bebbo @ Nov. 30 2006,13:30)|
|Quote (Seizure Salad @ Nov. 30 2006,12:08)|
|Isn't Dembski's Wikipedia article factually accurate? What's the issue?|
PS: Yet again, DaveScot gets shut down on a foreign corner of the internet and retreats to UD.
I don't think the Dembski page on Wikipedia is completely accurate. But nevertheless it's obviously written with a certain bias.
Factual / Pro Science?
I don't think it's completely factual. For instance it claimed that Dembski has no papers on any subject published in an academic journal but his CV shows a couple published in statistical journals. Even though I'm no fan of Dembski it does bug me that his Wiki page is obviously written from a totally anti-ID standpoint. I do think it's biased just by the choice of content, even if most of it is true.