Joined: July 2006
|Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 04 2012,11:48)|
|Ok, scientists, discuss....|
So your guy "won" the debate.
It's no surprise to me that somebody like you would support a liar.
Not just a liar, but a proven liar.
Not just a proven liar, but a proven liar who does not care that he's been shown to be a proven liar.
Not just a proven liar, but a proven liar who does not care that he's been shown to be a proven liar because people like you (low information voters) are happy to support as all you care about is appearances. Facts? Meh, not so much.
According to "science", that thing that you only care about if it tells you want you want to hear, some symptons of altitude sickness are:
|Symptoms can be mild - headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of appetite and shortness of breath. Or they can be quite serious, such as swelling in the lungs and brain, that can result in death if not properly and quickly treated.|
Let's see how well you'd perform if you had to debate suffering from all that.
Of course, I don't really think that's the reason.
But you asked what "science" had to say about such things. And now you know.
Or I could have just shorted this to:
"Do you want to talk about those Jellyfish yet, you ignorant harpy?"
Edited by oldmanintheskydidntdoit on Oct. 05 2012,06:12
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
if there are even critical flaws in Gaugerís work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand