Joined: Sep. 2005
[Graffiti moved to Bathroom Wall. - Wesley R. Elsberry]
|Serious Assault per 100,000.|
1. Australia 713.68
2. England & Wales 405.20
3. United States 357.94
Why don't your numbers match these numbers?
I trust nationmaster.com a little more, as they are not trying to make a social point about anything, just supplying data.
I agree that blacks are disproportionally responsible for crime in America. However, they are also disproportionally poor. I'm not convinced that being black makes you a criminal. I am convinced that being poor increases your chances of a life of crime. And that being black increases your chances of being poor. The question is, if whites were more likely to be poor, would whites be disproportionally responsible for crime. I would say yes. But our society hasn't run that experiment, yet.
Your logic is flawed. For in removing black crimes you are also removing poor crimes in America, while not removing poor crimes from the other countries (which they certainly have). This flawed logic of yours seems to be a theme.
|Thus if you remove homicides committed by blacks (total: 21862, Blacks:9316), and assume a proportionality between number of offenders and number of offenses, you can extrapolate US homicide offender rate of only 2.6/100,000, lower than Germany (3.27) and France (3.91).|
When the baby boomers reached their late teens crime increased. That's when people do crime. No suprise there. The coinciding was a coincidence.
|Think about this: if Christianity is so useless in creating a stable society, then why did America's exploding crime rates coincide with the secularization of the public sphere in the mid-sixties?|
Because that happens to be about 20 years after Roe v. Wade. Unwanted children are more likely to become criminals. And since more unwanted children were aborted after Roe v. Wade there were less criminals 17-20 years afterward. Simple math. And it relies nothing on Reagan.
|And why did crime rates start falling after Reagan assumed office and Christians resumed a more active role in public life?|
But crime plummeted in cities that DIDN'T apply Giuliani's theory. All across our nation. There is no consistent correlation between crime fighting methods and less crime. You are confused with correlation and causation. Giuliani may have been in charge when crime fell, but that doesn't mean he was the cause.
|And morality is indeed tied to crime: check out Giuliani's application of the "Broken Windows" theory to New York City. Get rid of the hookers and grifters, and watch the murder rate drop. Liberals predicted the utter failure of this approach, which of course demonstrated its usefulness to any rational mind. Its subsequent success was practically guaranteed.|