RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

  Topic: The Logical Fallacies of Evolution, Sophistry in Science< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 395
Joined: Aug. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 20 2005,10:17   

'Sfunny, because this exact false dichotomy is exactly how creationists justify their beliefs.

The argument "I personally find the evidence for evolution lacking, therefore Gawd musta dunnit" is a classic example of faulty reasoning of the sort Not X, therefore Y, where no independent justification whatever for (Y) is offered.

Even if the theory of evolution went belly up tomorrow (stop dreaming, TivoSpeech), I would still be under no compunction to embrace any form of creationism.

The is the beauty of being me- anything that any man does I can understand.
--Joe G

  6 replies since Oct. 20 2005,09:47 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]