Joined: Dec. 2002
|Quote (charlie d @ June 03 2003,09:47)|
|I think Behe would qualify. |
He had 31 papers, including several in PNAS and JMB up to 1996. Later in 1996, DBB comes out. Since then, a 1997 in Biochem Biophys Res Commun, and something that looks like a review (or a theoretical paper - I don't have access) in 1998 in DNA Seq. After that, nothing.
I was thinking of Wells, also, but there wasn't much productivity before he "came out" as a public voice for ID.
Keep 'em coming, folks!
Maybe we can compile these stories into a "Catalog of Scientific Decrepitude" (CSD). I envision a lot of graphs showing catastophic decline in output and citation index, coincident with the public adoption of an ID stance.