Joined: Feb. 2008
|Quote (Dan @ Oct. 08 2009,19:02)|
|FL's three "objections" are really just diversions, to try to divert attention away from the fact -- proven above -- that evolution is compatible with Christianity.|
My impression is that FLs definition of "incompatible" means "requires dissonance". IMO, that by itself falls within one of several reasonable interpretations of the phrase.
However, FL refused to define what he meant way back on page 5, and ignored my suggestion that he clarify, which doesn't say much for his interest in engaging in an honest discussion. Huge surprise