Joined: June 2006
|Quote (Quack @ Oct. 26 2009,17:27)|
|It may be okay to go there if you crave for a whiff of tard but I really think we should not honor them with the offering of comments there.|
They've chosen what company to keep, it is well deserved!
I debated whether or not to comment on the general relativity thread, it seemed like genuine interest on the part of the guy starting the thread. I had recently watched some BBC production called Einstein and Eddington, so I thought I'd share some of the history of the photograph of the eclipse, but another commenter (CTD) decided to crap all over the thread.
When you read stuff like:
| (Of the null result from the Michelson-Morley interferometer) I do understand outright lies. Your mention of apparatus indicates you're not just repeating the textbook lie either; you want to sound like you know some of the history. I do know the history, as will anyone who follows my link and investigates. You just made my ignore list. Be not seeing you.|
|Get real. Attempts have been made to measure the speed of gravity, and it leaves light standing still. Newton may yet be vindicated, although I know quite well who'll never admit it. If you had repeated it the way they did it, you would've obtained the same results. Others have.|
There's not enough HEAD-ON in the world to get through it.