Joined: Feb. 2006
Because this is progressing (in kind of a goofy way because of the moderation time) I will continue to cross post here. At the least Joseph can see it before the moderation lifts:
Explain the hominid fossil record from the ID paradigm.
Seeing that ID is neither anti-evolution nor anti- common ancestry and seeing tat fossils cannot tell us anything about mechanisms, ID is OK with the way the fossils are currently explained.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Sorry, Joseph, but you appear to be in disagreement with both kairosfocus and O’Leary. They specifically said that my spouse and his numerous colleagues had wasted their careers chasing a fantasy. So, do you break with the ID crowd here?