Seversky
Posts: 442
Joined: June 2010
|
| Quote | Now, to business: Darwinism of any kind is not supported by serious evidence.
It would be better to describe it as supported by philosophy, budgets, endowments, and court decisions, not by evidence.
People need to believe it.
Now here is my question: Is there really any important evidence that one species morphs into another by vast increases in information due to Darwinian survival of the fittest?
Or is this just another theory we need to believe? |
It doesn't matter what you believe, Denyse. To paraphrase one of my posts that never made it through to UD (hi, Clive!) just look at who uncovered all this function in so-called junk DNA. It wasn't ID proponents. They were too busy writing blog posts, articles and books complaining about the shortcomings of "Darwinism". Meanwhile, evolutionary biologists were in the labs doing the research and making the discoveries that the Paleyists are now crowing about. That's why evolution is a theory and ID is conjecture.
Oh, and while we're on the subject, Clive, if you want to come here and discuss objective morality or Lewis or Chesterton I'll be happy to oblige. Of course, you might not find it quite as comfortable in a place where others are free to write openly without fear of your finger hovering over the bannination button. Pass the word to Bully Arrington as well. Tell him the "moral monster" has a few matters he would like to discuss.
|
