Joined: Sep. 2002
|Quote (Lou FCD @ Sep. 26 2009,11:06)|
|Quote (Quack @ Sep. 26 2009,06:25)|
|Quote (sparc @ Sep. 26 2009,00:23)|
|Quote (Touchstone @ Sep. 25 2009,19:55)|
|Here's the ever-lovely Denyse:|
|For what it is worth, I have met genuinely humble scientists who brought credit to science – but they were usually experimentalists or medical scientists.|
Does she intend to imply that there is any such thing like experimental ID work?
However, I must admit that the relevance of Dr. Dembski's theoretic output surely does not exceed the impact of his experimental endeavors.
Funny, No "ID scientist" that I know of strikes me as humble. Dembski, Behe and the few others, humble is the last word I'd find appropriate.
They know ID is true, what remains is to get past legislation and have it taught in school.
I've heard Behe speak in person, and I have to say that my observation of him is quite in line with this.
He came off as a pompous twit.
Yeah, but he is a veritable saint compared to Jonathan Wells.
Those who know the truth are not equal to those who love it-- Confucius