RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Richard Simons



Posts: 425
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 15 2009,15:08   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Mar. 15 2009,13:28)
I'm no scientist, nor am I qualified to decide whether a proposed pathway would work or not.

We'd noticed.
 
Quote
I've said repeatedly that any proposed pathway - in order to meet my challenge - must be able to convince the actual scientists most familiar with the matter.

They have been convinced. It's just that you refuse to accept that you are not qualified to decide whether a proposed pathway would work or not, and refuse to accept that it has convinced the actual scientists most familiar with the matter.

--------------
All sweeping statements are wrong.

  
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]