Ptaylor
Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (RDK @ Aug. 23 2009,17:24) | Anyone else under the impression that Dembski and CliveBaby are one and the same?
I've never seen them post in the same thread, and after comparing their writing styles I've come to the inference that CliveBaby is just Dembski, pounding away at his keyboard, giggling like a Catholic schoolgirl, trying to give his blog credibility by making it seem like more people than just the journalist nanny with sand in her vag and Gil the elementary school math teacher actually care about his nonsense. |
Which would make the idea of 'Clive' opening the 'PZ Myers Does It Again' thread, only to have it serve as a continuation of comments from the Dr's closed comment 'Peer Reviewed Article' post even funnier.
However, I have my doubts. Dr Dembski has a flair for expressing bitterness that I haven't seen in Clive, baby's comments. I'll go try to find an example - oh, here we go in the current top post:
| Quote | | Janna Levin, Columbia astrophysicist, gives us the cutting-edge science on the origin of the universe: there was nothing, really nothing, nothing at all … but the potential to exist. Was it Aristotle who said that nothing admits no predicates? So where did nothing get the potential to exist and then bring the universe into existence? Not to worry. Janna does give us this assurance: “We know that something happened.” Yes, this is science at its best. Let’s not bring God or design into this discussion — we wouldn’t want to be accused of “acting stupidly.” Oh, one more thing, she’s an assistant professor (go here). Want to bet that she doesn’t have problems getting tenure? Compare this to Guillermo Gonzalez at Iowa State. |
My emphy.
--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016
|
