RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (500) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 2, general discussion of Dembski's site< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Freelurker



Posts: 80
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: April 29 2009,18:59   

Quote (Richardthughes @ April 29 2009,14:05)
Brace for UD Gush-fest:

http://www.physorg.com/news160153064.html

I can't judge whether or not this guy's ideas will ever contribute to our understanding of the history of life, but it's clear to me that he is not promoting ID.

He says up front that he is using "design" to mean "configuration, pattern, geometry." He's not talking about purpose. In other words, he is using "design" the way it is used in engineering, not the way it is used in ID.

The UD'ers will have to blatantly equivocate on the word "design" to argue that this guy's work is pro-ID. Which, of course, is exactly what they will do.

--------------
Invoking intelligent design in science is like invoking gremlins in engineering. [after Mark Isaak.]
All models are wrong, some models are useful. - George E. P. Box

  
  14997 replies since July 17 2008,19:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (500) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]