Joined: Jan. 2007
DaveScot wants us all to look at something and say that it exhibits "CSI", when in reality, it exibits "Looks like a city"-ness.
Dave, please tell us you have something better than that.
Or explain to me how you integrated over the uncertainty of functionally equivalent spaces to come to your CSI calculation. Otherwise I have a tip for you - you didn't use the explanatory filter - you used the "It looks like something I've seen before" pattern recognition approach. Even if Dembski wants you to think you're calculating CSI, or FCSI, or whatever the new code word of the day is, you're not.