sparc
Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007
|
DaveScot is not too happy with the new developments at UD | Quote | 76
DaveScot
12/31/2008
9:32 am
WJM
| Quote | | what gets authorized here as a legitimate part of the ID discussion has ramifications. |
Yeah but it’s not like Bill Dembski is doing the authorizing anymore and it’s not like Barry Arrington, who is doing the authorizing, is a fellow of the Discovery Institute.
So I wouldn’t worry too much about those ramifications when the sources are so easily impeached. |
As somebody predicted here there is going to be a tard fight. I would never have thaugt that tribune7 would agreed to a comment of mine:
| Quote |
77
tribune7
12/31/2008
9:57 am
| Quote | | Thus, irrespective of being true or not FSM is fully compatible with ID and should not be expelled from the discussion of possible designer identities. |
Exactly! And we should remember to point out that the FSM is a far more reasonable hypothesis than whatever flavor of the day the materialist crowd is using to explain what came before the Big Bang.
|
--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."
- William Dembski -
|
