Joined: June 2007
|Quote (lcd @ July 14 2008,13:03)|
|Quote (carlsonjok @ July 14 2008,10:30)|
|Quote (lcd @ July 14 2008,10:05)|
|As for scientific theories, are you sure you won't care if science is over turned? Isn't what this is all about? Fighting to keep one's belief in science over the Word of God?|
Low, science is overturned all the time and the thought of being the one to do it give scientists serious wood (so to speak).
Your rather interesting way to describe how a scientist would feel overturning science.
Still Darwinism remains a core belief of many, even on this board. I read what Louis posted but if that is so, then why is there such of fight over new ideas that threaten Darwinism and its stranglehold over science?
Because your aren't trying to replace it with evidence. Your trying to replace it with religious decree.
As you've found, there is no evidence. ID has lots of buzzwords, and none of which the proponents even know what they mean. There are no experiments. There are no test cases. There is nothing.
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris