RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (14) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A thread for William Wallace, To talk about important things< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 09 2008,16:30   

Quote (Quidam @ May 09 2008,09:23)
That isn't actually a pinhole camera - at least it doesn't use a pinhole lens.  It's a traditional camera but with a small lens.

The trouble is the words we use like focus, don't really apply to a pinhole.  A pinhole doesn't focus to a point, it doesn't have a focal length, it works by only allowing a narrow ray through.

So, basically, a bunch of us have been using the word focus the way creationists and IDists use the word theory.  See, the way I was thinking of it was, "focus" is a matter of degrees.  A particular image can be blurry but useful, a slightly less blurry one more useful, etc.  I wasn't thinking about it in terms of focal length or the mechanism producing the image, just how clear the image produced is.

Looks like I need to read up on optics.

WRT to the camera link:  there really are genuine CCD devices using a pinhole though, right?

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
  410 replies since May 03 2008,03:39 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (14) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]