RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (5) < [1] 2 3 4 5 >   
  Topic: The Traveling Twin Takes a Short Cut, Continuation of MG v Demski Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Occam's Toothbrush



Posts: 554
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 02 2008,10:14   

I think it's the diagnostic criteria for narcissism that would be relevant to the question, Thought Revoker, not the dictionary definition.  Excessive focus on dictionary definitions instead of scientific ones, of course, do seem to be quite emblematic of anti-science activists...

BTW, I'm not asserting that you are a narcissist by these criteria; I haven't paid a lot of attention to your comments here because I don't find your original post or this one very relevant to the EvC conflict which (mostly) brings me here.  I will say however, you're not as much of a narcissist as Larry Fafarman.  FWIW.

--------------
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
------
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"

  
  124 replies since Jan. 25 2008,22:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (5) < [1] 2 3 4 5 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]