RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Comparing Dembski and Mike Gene, Story of two attempts to infer design< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Thought Provoker



Posts: 530
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 06 2008,10:28   

Hi All,

Bob O'H wrote "How dare you teach them a third chord." accompanied by Richardthughes' "de-dur-de-...-dur-de-dur-de-dur Another #1"

I have to hand it to you guys.  At least you provide some quality entertainment.

Maybe, you are on to something.  Maybe, I've just fallen victim to thinking "even I could do better than this and I don't believe in the stuff" and then getting so carried away trying to make a convincing case, I started convincing myself.

BTW, my main focus is still bioquantum physics and the Hameroff/Penrose Orch OR model.

However, Dembski, DaveScot and their flock of well-trained followers  managed to get me riled up with their hypocritical treatment of Mike Gene and his book.

In case you missed it, here is the Uncommon Descent link to the thread I am talking about.

I am engaging in a little payback effort.

Instead of a Henry Moore sculpture, would there be interest in a Design Matrix analysis of the proverbial finding a Mount Rushmore scenario?

This has been suggested in the Telic Thoughts thread.  I could hit two birds with one stone that way.

  
  204 replies since Jan. 04 2008,22:07 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (7) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]