Joined: June 2007
|Quote (skeptic @ Jan. 10 2008,19:56)|
|and this is what I would call higher level semantics. If mutations are a result of causes then these causes are not occuring in a vaccum. They are occuring within the environment that the organism lives. In other words, mutations occur as a result of the enironment and actions of the organism. Whether or not the mutation has a direct impact upon the fitness of future generations or has more indirect result is probably up for grabs and maybe both depending upon the situation. To constantly claim that mutations occur with no apparent relation to fitness is only reality in a test tube, and probably not even there either.|
again, my opinion but not something that gets alot of play here because the perceived implications are too scary.
This is quite possibly the silliest thing I've ever heard you say.
That mutations are caused by the environment does not mean that mutations are related to the environment.
Taking a bath in radioactive waste will do wonders for your mutation rate, but it has absolutely no effect on what the mutations *do*, and it won't make the result of any mutation more likely than the result of a mutation caused by any other environment.
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris