Joined: Dec. 2002
|Quote (J-Dog @ Dec. 29 2008,12:35)|
|The Design Of Life Update - Because it is all about Teh Science::|
His research makes Dr. Seelke an ideally qualified scientist to carefully review the way DoL's authors handled the Ambrose "minimal gene mutations" question. Here, then, are a few of Prof. Seelke's comments: "I got a chance to read Dembski's discussion of Ambrose's work, and it's a good analysis of the problems with forming a new structure."
Hmmm... that wouldn't be the same Dembski who, in NFL, implied that females are evolutionary dead-ends, would it?
Dembski would almost certainly consider the transition in plants from annual to perennial to be irrelevant as well.