Joined: June 2007
No, she wouldn't. But thats because she subscribes to another set of morals - completely unrelated to this issue, that are a hell of a lot better than yours.
It is her position, and one I generally share, that if someone is not hurting anyone - what is it her business what they do in private? She doesn't make a moral judgment on what other people do because she considers it none of her business.
The world would be a lot better place if everyone felt the same.
You, on the other hand, think you have some right to tell other people how to live their lives. Why? What makes it your business?
Didn't your god tell you to worry about the log in your own eye before pointing out the mote in others?
Perhaps, instead of poking your nose into everyone else's business based on a book that you only follow when it suits you, you should adapt a stance closer to hers.
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris