RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (341) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: UnReasonable Kansans thread, AKA "For the kids"< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
EoRaptor013



Posts: 45
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 07 2007,10:46   

Re discussing facts, theories, and hypotheses, is anyone up to speed on the Fair Use doctrine (I think that's what it's called). I ask because, like most people at universities, pharmaceutical companies, and the like, I have access to a vast electronic collection of scientific publications. Seems to me that these endless discussion threads with FtK, VMartin, etc. could be substantially improved (and possibly  shortened) if their bald-faced assertions were countered by the regular posting of at least the abstract of a relevant, peer-reviewed, article.

While I know most of us have to make a living, I think even one posting per day would deliver a powerful message: The Fundgelicals assert there's a controversy in the scientific community; the rationalists counter with a mainstream, peer-reviewed, article; the Fungies say, "My mind's made up, don't confuse me with the facts."

$0.02

  
  10200 replies since Mar. 17 2007,23:38 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (341) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]