Joined: Feb. 2008
|Quote (Ftk @ July 11 2008,15:33)|
|That's pretty much what I figured. Selective reading.|
What you aren't getting, is that for anyone with any knowledge in the fields Walt Brown is commenting on can see that his theory makes about as much sense as the babbling of schizophrenic. Oh, the grammar and spelling is OK, and there's all kinds of big sciency sounding words and nice looking footnotes, but it's basically word salad. It's really that bad. You appear to have confused presentation with content.
The fact is the part Nerull quotes says all asteroids and comets originate from the earth. If Walt Brown says some originate some other way later on, he's contradicting himself, which doesn't help his case. If he doesn't, no amount of footnotes and verbiage will save him from the facts:
1) Long period comets have orbits longer than 5000 years
2) A long period comet approaching aphelion must, according to Walts crazy theory, have completed nearly a full orbit.
A quick search of http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/ shows more than 10 comets with a period > 1 million years.
Hydroplate theory, destroyed.
This is why people call you a lying creobot FTK. Because you never ever actually address any real arguments. I'll be happy to point out a few errors in detail if you promise to actually respond to them.
Assasinator: lucky for you, the book is online!. Warning: Do not expose irony or tard measuring devices to this link.