Joined: June 2007
|Quote (lcd @ July 11 2008,09:35)|
|Quote (Nerull @ July 11 2008,08:19)|
|I think its funny how even the other YECs think Barry is a loon. Answers in Genesis, for example. Institute for Creation Research also thinks C-decay is bullshit.|
Certainly no scientist takes him seriously.
For a theory so groundbreaking, you would think it might get the author more than 2 lines at wikipedia. ;)
EDIT - adding more:
The entire basis of c-decay is based on old measurements of the speed of light, before we had equipment to measure it accurately. The theory has no other basis, so we'll just look at that.
It turns out Barry here just ignored any reading that didn't agree with his bias and only picked those that fit. That's not how a scientist plots a trend.
When you include the readings he ignored, the 'change' in the speed of light goes away. Who would have thought? ;)
But, I suppose, Christians rarely worry about honesty.
I think you're trying to be funny or "save me" or something, but this Christian really does take honesty VERY seriously.
So why do you lie? Why does Barry only select sources which fit what he wants his graph to look like? That's dishonesty.
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris