Nerull
Posts: 317
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (Ftk @ June 12 2008,10:54) | | Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 12 2008,09:39) | | Quote (dnmlthr @ June 12 2008,09:24) | | Quote (Ftk @ June 12 2008,15:07) | | Of course. I've never argued that there are not any lateral mutations that benefit an organism. I'm saying that they are very few and far between, they are ~relatively~ non-existent, and that they are the result of massively complex systems already fully functional. |
Only a few pages back you said the following:
| Quote |
Common design. Mutations that have a negative affect on mammals. They break down the system, not build it up, btw.
|
|
LOL, classic - FTK which is it, one or the other? |
Oh, for God's sake. I've always concurred that there are occasional mutations that can produce slight lateral changes in an organism without causing damage.
Hello? How long have I been in this debate? How long have I been discussing these same issues over and over and over? Mutations are brought up all the freaking time.
I didn't say mutations "only" have a negative affect, but essentially that is usually how they affect an organism. |
Any evidence for that at all?
You've got a nasty habit of making grand pronouncements about scientific fields you know nothing about.
--------------
To rebut creationism you pretty much have to be a biologist, chemist, geologist, philosopher, lawyer and historian all rolled into one. While to advocate creationism, you just have to be an idiot. -- tommorris
|
