Joined: April 2006
|I am going to make individual assignments to the people here. |
1. Let me know why you disagree with Mike Gene's essay on the flagellum, and give some good arguments about how its assembly process evolved.
2. I want thoughtful critiques of separate chapters of Denton's book, Evolution in crisis.
3. Where did Berlinski go wrong in his assessment of the Nilsson-Pelger paper?
4. A full critique of Dembski's response to The Flagellum Unspun.
It's so sad. Avo thinks he/she can easily demonstrate the unfairness of our demands to actually cite ID theory and evidence by turning the questioning around and demanding the same pathetic level of detail we all know we'll never get from him/her or from ID. Of course, it will impact Avo's thinking not one bit that the people he/she's arguing with can immediately begin to thoroughly answer her questions, and he/she will never own up to the real meaning of the contrast between this and his/her/ID's own total inability and obstinate refusal to forthrightly answer ours.
|If you don't like the theory of evolution, no-one is going to be impressed with the nasty taste in your mouth. What's your evidence for not liking it?|
Right. Because, Avo, you're not just disliking it, you're trying to convince others they should dislike it too.
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"