Steviepinhead
Posts: 532 Joined: Jan. 2006
|
Yo, you complete self-annointed moron (since, leave us not forget, that's what rigorous application of Vmartin's "key-within-the-text" as applied to the text of Vmartin's self-selected screen-name led us to), Nabakov qualifies at most as a distinquished lay "expert" in butterfly--a high-level hobbyist.
His true expertise was literature. As a butterfly hobbyist, he may have been superb at identification and collection. As an evolutionary biologist, he has no credentials whatsoever.
Natural selection coordinates the environment with the creature and natural selection coordinates one creature with another. End of that story.
There is nothing "happenstance" about natural selection. Go step off a precipice and then come back to report whether there was anything "happenstance" about your demise and your failure to contribute further to the gene pool.
The remarkably productive field of evo-devo spells doom for arguments as repetitively moronic as your own. Further "contributions" from you, or from your proxies, Nabokov and Davison, should simply be ignored. They afford no learning opportunities, even for fence-sitting lurkers, because they lack any utile coherence whatsoever.
|