Joined: Feb. 2006
Let's just focus on one odd bit of phrasing by GoP --
"...before alternative explanations can hit the ground..."
What GoP clearly fails to realize is that for anything to be an alternative explanation, it must first be an...
WHAT are you trying to explain, Paley? For pages now people have been asking you to present this, and you've been wasting your time going off in other threads, abusing the [admittedly abuse-worthy] Foucoult, and other time-wasting nonsense.
Kindly lay out what your "alternative explanation" is going to explain, then lay out the purported explanation, show how it is explanatory, and let us have at it.
But you won't do that, will you?
Either you can't, or it's not part of the game you're playing.