Joined: Dec. 2002
My point regarding frameshift mutations is this: you claimed that "we" don't understand enough of the "DNA language" to know that the human GULOP pseudogene is homologous to certain other genes in other organisms.
I asked a very basic question about the kinds of mutations we frequently see in these kinds of situations. You'd never heard of them.
I submit that the fact that YOU don't understand the "DNA language" does not mean that no-one else does.
If you're really interested in understanding the evidence for the homology between GULOP and GLO, you'll need to do some research. If you're more intent on drawing a scientific conclusion based on its moral consequences, then this whole conversation becomes somewhat pointless. Don't you think?