RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (202) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: AF Dave's UPDATED Creator God Hypothesis, Creation/Evolution Debate< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 4221
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 26 2006,16:09   

Quote
On the other hand, if you are a YEC, life is easy and explanations are easy ...


Wow, Davie gets it right twice in one week! Ignorance truly is bliss for a YEC, eh Davie?  Or is it 'no brains, no headaches!' for you? :D

If you're a YEC, explanations are easy because you get to lie and make shit up as you go.  What could be easier than that?  You don't need any of that 'evidence' stuff, or that 'pathetic level of detail' that actual science requires, no siree!  You just pull a fantastic claim (the more known scientific laws it violates, the better) out of some orifice, then declare it to be true in ALL BOLD, CAPITAL LETTERS unless the  evil atheist Evos disprove it.

Doing actual science, OTOH can be brutally hard, dirty, repetitive work.  Some experiments or field research can occupy a scientist's whole professional career.  Of course, the rewards are a much better detailed understanding of the world we live and the physical processes that make it so.

Davie, I notice you haven’t uttered one peep about the NKJV being a non-inerrant translation, something you finally admitted after 3 months of “IT”S LITERAL AND INERRANT!!” bullshit from you.  You haven’t addressed at all the fact that you’re defending an imperfect translation and not the original text.  I know that must be giving you fits, because it cuts the legs right out from under your biggest argument - ‘because the Bible says it, it must be true’.

C’mon Davie –speak up!  Tell us how you justify claiming that because something appears in a known imperfect English translation it must be literal and true. Then tell us:

How do you determine which parts of the NKJV Bible are literal and inerrant, which are metaphor, and which are just plain wrong?

These are important questions Dave, and they won't go away.

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"I'm a female retired marine biologist"

Whizz-dumb from Joe "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest female impersonator YEC.

  
  6047 replies since May 01 2006,03:19 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (202) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]